Zionists are “secular” but they use God as their “land agent” who gave them the “promised land”, says Professor Avi Shlaim of Oxford University. Jews are God’s “chosen people” who are exempt from the rules that apply to non-Jews, according to Israeli author and journalist Gideon Levy. Israel is carrying out “ethnic cleansing … and that may become genocide”, adds Israeli-American scholar Omer Bartov. “No, Palestinians did not commit acts of terrorism, Israel did”, tweets Miko Peled, an ex-IDF soldier and son of a former Israeli general. These few quotes summarize the current thoughts of some of the former Zionists.
Israeli author and journalist Gideon Levy:
The core of Zionism is the “feeling of being chosen people” that is “deep-rooted” in Israel. A consequence of this is that the rules and laws that apply to others do not apply to Israelis. Here’s a quote from one of his speeches:
“This is the core of Zionism. This feeling of chosen people is still very deep-rooted in Israel. The consequence is that everything which refers to any other country in the world does not refer to Israel. That we are a special case. That international law should be implemented everywhere, but we are a different case. That a Molotov bottle against a Jewish soldier is not like a Molotov bottle against a Russian soldier because we are different, because we are chosen, because of this damned Jewish supremacy”.
On Israel’s campaign of dehumanizing Palestinians, Levy says:
“My biggest struggle is to rehumanize the Palestinians. There’s a whole machinery of brainwashing in Israel that really accompanies each of us from early childhood, and I’m a product of this machinery as much as anyone else. [We are taught] a few narratives that it’s very hard to break. That we Israelis are the ultimate and only victims. That the Palestinians are born to kill, and their hatred is irrational. That the Palestinians are not human beings like us… So you get a society without any moral doubts, without any question marks, with hardly public debate. To raise your voice against all this is very hard.”
Levy believes that the talk of the peace process and the two-state solution is a scam perpetrated by Zionists. Here’s Levy in his own words:
“Now the real turning point should be, for us, the moment that each of us realizes that the Israeli occupation is not a temporary phenomenon. I think that most of the people, if not all of them, understand that the occupation is there to stay. And Israel never had the slightest intention to put an end to it. All the efforts were only to mislead the West and to maintain the occupation. All this longest peace process in history, which never led to anywhere, was never aimed to lead to anywhere. All those efforts were only in order to mislead you and enable the occupation to grow, including Oslo”.
Professor Avi Shlaim:
Oxford Professor Avi Shlaim believes that Israel “prefers land to peace”, adding that “land grabbing and peacemaking don’t go together”. Here’s his exact quote:
“Land grabbing and peacemaking don’t go together, it’s one or the other, and by constantly expanding settlements, Israel showed that it prefers land to peace….Israel by its actions has shown that it is not interested in having a Palestinian partner for peace because it wants to maintain its control over the territory. Israel refuses to accept Hamas as a negotiating partner. Israel’s position is that Hamas is a terrorist organization – pure and simple. It will never negotiate with it. Benjamin Netanyahu’s policy has been to let Hamas rule the Gaza Strip but to contain the Gaza Strip, and this policy collapsed because Gaza could not be contained.”
Professor Omer Bartov:
Holocaust scholar Omer Bartov has warned of “genocide” in Gaza. He has talked about a “clear intention of ethnic cleansing” in the narrow strip of two million Palestinians under heavy bombardment by Israeli forces since the October 7 terrorist attack by Hamas in Israel. Here’s a quote from him:
“So, my sense is the following. Israeli political leaders and military leaders have made very startling and frightening statements about Gaza, speaking about flattening Gaza, speaking about Hamas, but by sort of extending it also, by extension, also Gazans, in general, as human animals, speaking about moving the entire population of Gaza out of Gaza. That is a clear intention of ethnic cleansing. So, those statements show intent. And that’s a genocidal intent, which is often very difficult to prove in genocide. People who carry out genocide don’t always want to say that they’re doing it”.
Former Israeli Soldier Miko Peled:
Miko Peled, whose father was a general in the IDF and who himself served in the Israeli military, says that Israel is the biggest obstacle to peace in the Middle East. Talking about the October 7 surprise attack by Hamas on Israel, he says that “Israel is behaving like a gangster who has been humiliated taking vengeance upon innocent civilians, killing thousands upon thousands”. “It’s not a question of self-defense, it’s a question of brutality and revenge because Israel was humiliated”, he adds in an interview on Al Jazeera English.
Peled accuses Israel of lying about the October 7 attack. He said the testimony is now showing that most of the Israeli civilians on October 7 were killed by the Israeli helicopters firing indiscriminately. He says the Western governments who support Israel “are supporting the fight against justice, the fight against peace”.
Peled says that “liberal Zionism” is a myth and all forms of Zionism amount, in practice, to the denial of fundamental rights and freedoms for the Palestinian people. This process starts at a young age for Israeli children whose history textbooks claim that the Palestinians left their homes of their own free will and that they were not driven out by Jewish militias in the 1940s. These history books deny what the Palestinians call “Nakbah”, meaning Great Catastrophe, that forced them to flee their homes as part of the Zionist plan to ethnically cleanse what is now Israel.
Thank you for taking the time to read my blog post! really want to believe that you thought it was useful and locked in. I would enormously see the value in your criticism of the substance and composing style. Did the article give important experiences? Was it clear and straightforward? Were there any areas that could be refined?
Your criticism is unquestionably significant to me as it assists me with understanding what reverberates with my perusers and how I can upgrade future posts. Please feel free to share any suggestions or ideas for future topics you’d like me to cover. I anticipate hearing your considerations and proceeding to furnish you with significant substance. Many thanks to you!
